Difference Between De Facto And De Jure and the Difference Between Statutory And Quasi-Judicial Bodies

Law is an optional subject that is quickly gaining popularity among UPSC aspirants. In the IAS exam, the subject has a good success rate of 15 - 20%. Although it is a technical subject that only law graduates or postgraduates study, it is also open to non-law students. With thorough knowledge of important topics like the Difference Between Statutory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies, anyone can take up this optional and clear the UPSC exam.

On that note, let’s learn about the de facto and de jure difference along with the Difference Between De Facto And De Jure to help the UPSC Civil Service exam candidates understand the fundamentals and compare them thoroughly.

Difference between Statutory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies

The difference between Statutory and Quasi-Judicial bodies is explained in detail here. This topic is significant in terms of the Indian Polity Syllabus. Statutory Bodies are so-called because statutes are laws enacted by Parliament or the legislature. A quasi-judicial body can be an individual or a group with powers similar to those of a court of law. Let's learn about the difference between Statutory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies in detail.

The major difference between Statutory and Quasi-Judicial Bodies is:

Statutory Bodies	Quasi-Judicial Bodies
These are non-constitutional bodies because they are not mentioned in the Constitution.	A quasi-judicial body can be an individual or a group with powers similar to those of a court of law.
Central Vigilance Commission (CVC), Central Information Commission (CIC), and Unique Identification Development Authority of India are some of the important Statutory Bodies (UIDAI)	The Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG), the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the National Green Tribunal, the Banking Ombudsman, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Railway Claims Tribunal, and others are important quasi-judicial bodies.
All statutory bodies are created and operate under the provisions of their own enabling legislation, which defines the agency's purpose and specific powers.	Quasi-judicial activity is limited to issues pertaining to the specific administrative agency. These bodies are set up to alleviate the burden on the courts. Quasi-Judicial Bodies have the authority to adjudicate and decide on penalties for the guilty.
Statutory Bodies are not restricted to particular domains or departments. As an example, consider the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Its role is to monitor all vigilance activity under the Central Government and to advise various Central Government authorities.	The powers of Quasi-Judicial Bodies are limited to specific domains. Examples include the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, and the Railway Claims Tribunal, among others.
It is legal for Statutory Bodies to pass laws.	Quasi-Judicial Bodies resolve disputes in accordance with existing laws.

Difference between De Facto and De Jure

Let’s learn about the difference between De Facto and De Jure in detail. 

• In law and government, de facto refers to practises that exist in reality despite not being officially recognised by laws.

• In law and government, de jure refers to legalised practices, regardless of whether the practice exists in reality.

The following are the main differences between de facto and de jure:

De Facto	De Jure
De Facto is another term for Factual Recognition.	De Jure refers to legal recognition.
De Facto status is only temporary. It is not as permanent as De Jure. It is a provisional and temporary recognition that can be revoked.	De Jure, which is a legal recognition, is permanent and cannot be revoked.
The recognition granted by De Facto is based on a factual situation and is not a legal process.	De Jure is a legal recognition granted after following the proper legal procedure.
There is no exchange of diplomatic representatives.	There is a change of diplomatic delegates.
De facto succession laws do not apply.	State succession laws are used under De Jure.
A state asset or public debt cannot be recovered by the De Facto Government.	State property or public debt can only be recouped by a de jure government.

After learning about the aforementioned differences, it is best to thoroughly understand the details of Constitutional, Statutory, and Quasi-Judicial Bodies.

THANK YOU SO MUCH