Net Neutrality: A public Deamd

• Meaning of net neutrality. 
• Problems created by the absence of net neutrality. 
• Importance of net neutrality for small business orders. startups and entrepreneurs.
• Passing an order by FCC for 'Open Internet Order'
• India has no law for neutral internet:. 
• The revolutionary decision was taken by TRAI. 

Network neutrality is the principle that ensures competition in the online world. All content on the Internet travels as data packets on telecommunications networks worldwide. Net neutrality requires that all data traveling through the network be treated equally.

Telecom companies, which have the infrastructure through which data packets interfere, argue that they should have the right to regulate this information flow and charge to ensure that specific information takes precedence over others Or does not take away some data independence. Must have, etc.

His reasoning is that since telecom companies spend a lot of money on building infrastructure (or through data packet passing tubes), they should talk about the content or how it travels, and of course, Earns more money than. Network neutrality is the principle on which Internet traffic will be treated equally, without discrimination, limitation or interference, regardless of its sender, recipient, content, so as not to support or distribute the Internet user's freedom of choice Performs or interferes with the delivery of specific content, services, applications or devices. transportation.

In layman terms, net neutrality means an Internet that allows everyone to communicate freely. This means that access to all content and applications should be allowed regardless of the source of a service provider, and I should not block any websites or pages unless they are invalid. It is like a fixed telephone line, which is the same for everyone and no one can decide who you call or what you talk about. Another aspect of net neutrality is the level playing field on the Internet.

This means that all websites can co-exist without disrupting others. All websites are accessible at the same speed and are not intended for a particular website. For example, electricity is common to all. Net neutrality also means that all websites and content creators are treated equally, and you do not need to pay extra for faster internet speed on a particular site or service.

The absence of net neutrality changes the presence of the Internet as we know it. This would force internal service providers (ISPs) to charge companies for companies like YouTube or Netflix as they consume more bandwidth and ultimately place more payment burden on consumers. Like this.

ISPs can then create a slow Internet as well as a fast Internet lane, which is at the same speed and one which means that not all websites can be accessed only in case of overpayment. For example, you currently have a standardized data package and it accesses all content at the same speed regardless of any international website or national.

Likewise, ISPs can charge extra for free calls you pay, such as additional payable WhatsApp, Skype and loads of others, and even some over-the-top (OTT) players who are consumers. Push it. Neutrality is very important for small business owners, startups and entrepreneurs who can only launch their business online, advertise and provide products, and sell them publicly without discrimination.

This is necessary to create innovation and job opportunities. Large companies such as Google, Twitter, and many others were born due to net neutrality. With increasing access to the Internet in India and we are becoming a breeding ground for startups and entrepreneurs, the lack of net neutrality worries us a lot. It is also very important for the freedom to speak so that a person can voice their opinions without fear of being interrupted or restricted.


In the West, on May 25, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) passed an order to intercept or intercept broadband Internet service providers' traffic known as the "Open Internet Order" on the Web, confirming that the Internet was all Will remain a level playing for.

The FCC has approved 'net neutrality' rules that either slow down or stop Internet traffic, or prevent the Internet from lending to content providers such as Netflix or block Internet providers such as Netflix. European Union member states are also striving for neutrality.

In India, there is no law that explicitly mandates neutral internet maintenance. There is no law governing net neutrality in India until 25 August, requiring all Internet users to behave equally, discriminated by the user, content, site, platform, application, connected device type, or communication method. Or without charging.


Meanwhile, Sonic Indian service providers have violated several net neutrality policies. On February 10, 2015, Facebook launched the Internet.RRT in India with Reliance Communications. It aims to provide free access to 38 websites through one app. Bing was only available as a search engine. On 27 April, Airtel announced the 'Airtel Zero' project. Under this project, app companies sign a contract and provide free applications to Airtel customers. The e-commerce company Flipkart joining the Airtel Zero scheme received a negative response.


The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRI) has already published a formal consultation paper on the regulatory framework for over-the-top (OTT) services, which unilaterally seeks public opinion from the consultant and criticizes it for ambiguity. It has received condemnation from various politicians and Indian Internet users.

The trio has issued another consultation paper on differential pricing for data services. This was seen as a major improvement compared to previous suggestions. But there has been a drop in controversy between the telecom regulator and OTT players.

The idea of ​​telecom regulators is that OTT players are eating their revenue without investing in networks like WhatsApp, WeChat, etc. On the other hand, OTT players defend themselves by demanding access to web services without discrimination.

The IRAI took a revolutionary decision to ban telecom service providers from collecting discriminatory rates for data, thus ruling in favor of net neutrality in India. The move has not only been welcomed by millions of Indians but has also been welcomed by various political parties, business people, industry leaders, and the World Wide Web.

The Internet, in its purest form, is a veritable fountain of information. At its core is a commitment to both openness and a layered playing field, where the ability to innovate is sustained. But one of the problems with Free Basics and indeed Airtel Zero is that the consumer has no choice as to which websites he can access for free.

Those who argue in favor of net neutrality see the move as an unethical consequence that follows unethical practices. They are not immune to the notion of over-access to the Internet, according to them, neglecting neutrality may prove increasingly fatal in the long run to gain greater access to the Internet.